Exploring Why and How Journal Editors Retract Articles: Findings From a Qualitative Study

Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (1):1-11 (2013)
Abstract
Editors have a responsibility to retract seriously flawed articles from their journals. However, there appears to be little consistency in journals’ policies or procedures for this. In a qualitative study, we therefore interviewed editors of science journals using semi-structured interviews to investigate their experience of retracting articles. We identified potential barriers to retraction, difficulties in the process and also sources of support and encouragement. Our findings have been used as the basis for guidelines developed by the Committee on Publication Ethics
Keywords Retractions  Reasons  Medical research
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11948-011-9292-0
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,157
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Responsible Conduct in Research.P. J. D. Drenth - 2006 - Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (1):13-21.
An Ethical "Blind Spot": Problems of Anonymous Letters to the Editor.Bill Reader - 2005 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 20 (1):62 – 76.
Research Into Quality Management and Social Responsibility.Juan José Tarí - 2011 - Journal of Business Ethics 102 (4):623-638.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-07-15

Total downloads

17 ( #282,106 of 2,163,655 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #348,043 of 2,163,655 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums