Genealogy as Meditation and Adaptation with the Han Feizi

The Monist 105 (4):452-469 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper focuses on an early Chinese conception of genealogical argumentation in the late Warring States text Han Feizi and a possible response it has to the problem of genealogical self-defeat as identified by Amia Srinivasan —i.e., the genealogist cannot seem to support their argument with premises their interlocutor or they themselves can accept, given their own argument. The paper offers a reading of Han Fei’s genealogical method that traces back to the meditative practice of an earlier Daoist text the Zhuangzi and its communicative strategy, providing a conception of genealogy aimed at undoing fixations on political systems in order to bring about a more adaptive state—specifically, genealogy that does not require epistemological commitment to its premises.

Other Versions

No versions found

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-01-01

Downloads
763 (#26,486)

6 months
187 (#17,130)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Lilith W. Lee
VU University Amsterdam

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A Darwinian dilemma for realist theories of value.Sharon Street - 2006 - Philosophical Studies 127 (1):109-166.
Critique of Forms of Life.Rahel Jaeggi - 2018 - Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

View all 74 references / Add more references