Harman and Others on Moral Relativism

Review of Metaphysics 42 (4):783 - 795 (1989)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

IT IS NO LONGER UNUSUAL to find ethical or moral relativism defended, yet there remains some uneasiness about the position, even among its defenders. Richard Brandt, for example, who offers a version he finds "somewhat plausible," admits that he and most other philosophers "have an anti-relativist predilection, at least when we come to moral issues which are important."

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Critique of Harman’s Empiric Relativism.Byron L. Haines - 1993 - Journal of Philosophical Research 18:97-107.
A Problem for Harman’s Moral Relativism.William L. Langenfus - 1988 - Philosophy Research Archives 14:121-136.
System relativism.Charles Sayward - 1988 - Ratio 1 (2):163-175.
Relativism and the foundations of liberalism.Graham Mark Long - 2004 - Charlottesville, VA: Imprint Academic.
Moral relativism defended.Gilbert Harman - 1975 - Philosophical Review 84 (1):3-22.
Harman on Moral Relativism.G. F. Schueler - 1978 - Journal of Critical Analysis 7 (3):99-103.
Harman's Defence of Moral Relativism.Wojciech Sadurski - 1989 - Philosophical Investigations 12 (1):33-51.
Gilbert Harman's defense of moral relativism.Henning Jensen - 1976 - Philosophical Studies 30 (6):401 - 407.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
45 (#345,268)

6 months
3 (#992,474)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references