Hume's Dictum and the asymmetry of counterfactual dependence

In Alastair Wilson (ed.), Chance and Temporal Asymmetry. Oxford University Press. pp. 258-279 (2014)
Why believe Hume's Dictum, according to which there are, roughly speaking, no necessary connections between wholly distinct entities? Schaffer suggests that HD, at least as applied to causal or nomological connections, is motivated as required by the best account of of counterfactuals---namely, a similarity-based possible worlds account, where the operative notion of similarity requires 'miracles'---more specifically, worlds where entities of the same type that actually exist enter into different laws. The main cited motivations for such an account of similarity are first, that some salient contexts presuppose CF asymmetry, and second, that accounts of CFs failing to presuppose CF asymmetry are epistemologically problematic, such that under conditions of determinism, the variations in initial micro-conditions needed to implement a given counterfactual antecedent would result in so many changes to macro-states that evaluation of CFs would be rendered practically impossible. Against the first reason, I argue that no non-artificial contexts presuppose CF asymmetry; against the second, I observe that such micro-variation is compatible, in principle, with significant similarity as regards macroscopic states of affairs---enough, in particular, to allow CFs to be appropriately evaluated
Keywords necessity  counterfactuals  possible worlds  contingentism  necessitarianism  asymmetry of counterfactual dependence  causal theory of properties  Hume's Dictum  necessary connections  David Lewis
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 31,856
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Schaffer on Laws of Nature.Alastair Wilson - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 164 (3):653-667.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Counterfactuals and Explanation.Boris Kment - 2006 - Mind 115 (458):261-310.
Schaffer on Laws of Nature.Alastair Wilson - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 164 (3):653-667.
Counterfactuals: The Epistemic Analysis.John-Michael Kuczynski - 2005 - Philosophia Scientiae 9 (1):83-126.
Counterpossibles.Barak Krakauer - 2012 - Dissertation, University of Massachusetts
Do the Closest Counterfactual Worlds Contain Miracles?Phillip Goggans - 1992 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 73 (2):137 - 149.
On Similarity in Counterfactuals.Ana Arregui - 2009 - Linguistics and Philosophy 32 (3):245-278.
Counterfactuals.Igal Kvart - 1992 - Erkenntnis 36 (2):139 - 179.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
277 ( #14,228 of 2,231,877 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #65,829 of 2,231,877 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature