Review of Kitcher [Book Review]

Human Nature Reviews 4 (1):1-13 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The philosophy of biology began to develop as a distinct field within the philosophy of science in the early 1970s, shortly before Philip Kitcher turned from mathematics and physics to biology in his thinking about general issues concerning the nature of science. Not only did the answers to traditional questions within the field seem problematic once one turned from the “hard sciences” to the softer biological sciences, but the questions themselves came to be viewed as less obviously the right ones to be asking.



External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Review of Kitcher. [REVIEW]I. Hacking - forthcoming - Journal of Philosophy.
Well‐Ordered Science: Evidence for Use.Nancy Cartwright - 2006 - Philosophy of Science 73 (5):981-990.
Reduction and instrumentalism in genetics.Philip Gasper - 1992 - Philosophy of Science 59 (4):655-670.
The Philosophy of Philip Kitcher.Mark Couch & Jessica Pfeifer (eds.) - 2016 - New York, NY: Oxford University Press USA.
The Characterization of Epistemology in Philip Kitcher: A Critical Reflection from New Empiricism.Inmaculada Perdomo - 2012 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 101 (1):113-138.
Nature, Life, and Teleology.Vittorio Possenti - 2002 - Review of Metaphysics 56 (1):37 - 60.
The philosophy of biology.David L. Hull & Michael Ruse (eds.) - 1973 - New York: Oxford University Press.


Added to PP

133 (#141,487)

6 months
38 (#100,469)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Robert A. Wilson
University of Western Australia

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references