In this case (5) yields the result that A and D are I-related, but neither is I-related to B or C – the original person has two beginnings of existence. To get round this we need to add to (5)’s right-hand side the condition that there is no pair of distinct, simultaneously occurring person-stages u and v such that u is R-related to x and y and v is R-related to x and no pair of distinct, simultaneously occurring personstages u and v such that u is R-related to x and y and v is R-related to y. In fact this condition can replace (iic) on the RHS of (5).
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Une Application Des N-Univers a l'Argument de l'Apocalypse Et au Paradoxe de Goodman.Paul Franceschi - unknown
Directions of Fit and the Humean Theory of Motivation.Mary Clayton Coleman - 2008 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 86 (1):127 – 139.
In Defence of an Argument for Evans's Principle: A Rejoinder to Vahid.John N. Williams - 2006 - Analysis 66 (290):167–170.
Carter on Anthropic Principle Predictions.Patrick A. Wilson - 1994 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (1):241-253.
Evans's Anti-Cartesian Argument: A Critical Evaluation.Anne Newstead - 2006 - Ratio 19 (June):214-228.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads36 ( #143,577 of 2,171,798 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #326,702 of 2,171,798 )
How can I increase my downloads?