In Federica Russo & Jon Williamson (eds.), Causality and Probability in the Sciences. pp. 217--242 (2007)
How should probabilities be interpreted in causal models in the social and health sciences? In this paper we take a step towards answering this question by investigating the case of cancer in epidemiology and arguing that the objective Bayesian interpretation is most appropriate in this domain
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The Metaphysics of Causal Models: Where's the Biff?Toby Handfield, Charles R. Twardy, Kevin B. Korb & Graham Oppy - 2008 - Erkenntnis 68 (2):149-68.
Recursive Bayesian Nets for Prediction, Explanation and Control in Cancer Science.Jon Williamson - unknown
Models for Prediction, Explanation and Control: Recursive Bayesian Networks.Jon Williamson - 2011 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 26 (70):5-33.
On Causal Inference in Determinism and Indeterminism.Joseph Berkovitz - 2002 - In Harald Atmanspacher & Robert C. Bishop (eds.), Between Chance and Choice: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Determinism. Thorverton Uk: Imprint Academic. pp. 237--278.
Objective Bayesian Nets for Systems Modelling and Prognosis in Breast Cancer.Jon Williamson - manuscript
Combining Argumentation and Bayesian Nets for Breast Cancer Prognosis.Matt Williams & Jon Williamson - 2006 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 15 (1-2):155-178.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads422 ( #4,849 of 2,143,899 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #387,257 of 2,143,899 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.