Kant and the Selfish Hypothesis

Social Theory and Practice 41 (3):377-402 (2015)

Eric Wilson
Georgia State University
One of the major debates of early modern philosophy concerned what David Hume called “the selfish hypothesis.” According to this view, all human conduct is motivated by self-love. Influential versions can be found in the writings of Hobbes, Mandeville, the Jansenists, and La Rochefoucauld. Important critics of this view included Butler, Shaftesbury, Hutcheson, Rousseau, Hume, and Smith. My essay argues that we should add Kant to this list of critics. I propose that Kant knew about this important debate and responded to it. More specifically, I propose that he responded at two different levels. At one level, Kant sided with the critics, arguing for the reality of genuine fellow feeling. At another level, he concluded that everyone was arguing about the wrong thing. All the critics of the selfish hypothesis seek to vindicate common morality, but Kant thought this required establishing the possibility of human freedom. He believed that instead of arguing about whether we are capable of responding in a genuinely compassionate or sympathetic way to other people, we should be arguing about whether we are capable of responding in a nonmechanical way to the demands of morality. Looking at Kant’s practical philosophy from this underexplored perspective sheds new light on his doctrines of respect and moral worth. It renders both more interesting and intelligible, and it illuminates the direct connection between these doctrines and the fundamental concerns of his entire critical project.
Keywords Applied Philosophy  Contemporary Philosophy  Social and Political Philosophy
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0037-802X
DOI 10.5840/soctheorpract201541321
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 48,902
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Fashioning a Selfish Self Amid Selfish Goals.Roy F. Baumeister & Bo M. Winegard - 2014 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 37 (2):136-137.
The Selfish Goal Meets the Selfish Gene.Steven L. Neuberg & Mark Schaller - 2014 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 37 (2):153-154.
Unselfishness.Christopher G. Framarin - 2008 - International Philosophical Quarterly 48 (1):69-83.
Values, Meaning and Identity: The Case for Morality.Alexander Holtby Boston - 2002 - Dissertation, The University of British Columbia (Canada)
4. Kant and Nietzsche on Self-Knowledge.Paul Katsafanas - 2015 - In Bartholomew Ryan, Maria Joao Mayer Branco & João Constancio (eds.), Nietzsche and the Problem of Subjectivity. De Gruyter. pp. 110-130.
Kant and Religion: Conflict or Compromise?Chris L. Firestone - 1999 - Religious Studies 35 (2):151-171.
Kant on Descartes and the Brutes.Steve Naragon - 1990 - Kant-Studien 81 (1):1-23.
Kant and the Limits of Autonomy by Susan Meld Shell (Review).Eric Entrican Wilson - 2013 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 51 (2):322-323.


Added to PP index

Total views
18 ( #522,933 of 2,309,716 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #521,891 of 2,309,716 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature