Australasian Journal of Philosophy 74 (1):135 – 149 (1996)

Authors
John N. Williams
Singapore Management University
Abstract
I argue that Moore's propositions, for example, 'I went to the pictures last Tuesday but I don't believe that I did' cannot be rationally believed. Their assertors either cannot be rationally believed or cannot be believed to be rational. This analysis is extended to Moorean propositions such as God knows that I am an atheist and I believe that this proposition is false. I then defend the following definition of assertion: anyone asserts that p iff that person expresses a belief that p with the intention of causing relevant epistemic change in the cognition of an actual or potential audience
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2016
DOI 10.1080/00048409612347111
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 52,704
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Knowledge and Belief.Jaakko Hintikka - 1962 - Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Blindspots.Roy A. Sorensen - 1988 - Oxford University Press.
On Denoting.Bertrand Russell - 1905 - Mind 14 (56):479-493.

View all 31 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Believing Things Unknown.Aidan McGlynn - 2013 - Noûs 47 (2):385-407.
Assertion, Moore, and Bayes.Igor Douven - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 144 (3):361-375.

View all 16 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
66 ( #142,432 of 2,340,056 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #516,585 of 2,340,056 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes