Microsoft on copyright: An ethical analysis

Abstract

“This chapter looks at four arguments which Microsoft has used to justify the claim that illegal copying of software is wrong: software piracy is theft; software piracy violates the rights of copyright holders; software piracy is free riding; and software piracy reduces incentives to future innovation. It argues that the first argument is simply wrong, and the other three do not establish that it is in fact wrong to pirate Microsoft’s programs.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,480

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-07-15

Downloads
33 (#351,094)

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

James Wilson
University College London

Citations of this work

GM Crops: Patently Wrong? [REVIEW]James Wilson - 2007 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 20 (3):261-283.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references