Moore's Paradox and Self-Knowledge


Abstract
What explanation is there of the source of my justification for my beliefs about my beliefs that respects the fact that I am normally the best authority on them? Moore's paradox demands an explanation of the absurdity of believing or asserting possible truths of the forms p but I don't believe that p or p but I believe that not-p. I argue for Evans principle that whatever justifies me in believing that p also justifies me in believing that I believe that p. This helps explain how I come to know my own beliefs and also shows that it is impossible for a Moorean belief to be justified. I then explain the absurdity of Moorean assertion while avoiding the messy notion of 'expressing belief' yet acknowledging Shoemaker’s constraint that if I cannot non-absurdly believe that p then I cannot non-absurdly assert that p.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 43,049
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Moore's Problem with Iterated Belief.Roy Sorensen - 2000 - Philosophical Quarterly 50 (198):28-43.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Self-Knowledge, Rationality and Moore’s Paradox.Jordi Fernández - 2005 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (3):533-556.
Moore’s Paradoxes and Conscious Belief.John Nicholas Williams - 2003 - Philosophical Studies 127 (3):383-414.
Comments on Moore's Paradox and Self-Knowledge.Rogers Albritton - 1995 - Philosophical Studies 77 (2-3):229-239.
Moore’s Paradox and Self-Knowledge.Sydney Shoemaker - 1995 - Philosophical Studies 77 (2-3):211-28.
Moore's Paradox and Epistemic Norms.Clayton Littlejohn - 2010 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (1):79 – 100.
Shoemaker, Self-Blindness and Moore's Paradox.Amy Kind - 2003 - Philosophical Quarterly 53 (210):39-48.
Racionalidade epistêmica e o Paradoxo de Moore.Cláudio de Almeida - 2009 - Veritas – Revista de Filosofia da Pucrs 54 (2):48-73.
Moore's Paradox - One or Two?John N. Williams - 1979 - Analysis 39 (3):141-142.
Telic Higher-Order Thoughts and Moore's Paradox.Bernard W. Kobes - 1995 - Philosophical Perspectives 9:291-312.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-07-02

Total views
9 ( #765,386 of 2,260,175 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #324,289 of 2,260,175 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature