Philosophy 73 (4):573-592 (1998)
The paper is adressed to Michael Levin's recent Philosophy article ‘Natural Submission, Aristotle on.’ Levin argues that rule by the naturally dominant is for the best and that the naturally submissive ought to accept it as just and even inevitable. I point out some confusions in his attempt to link merit-conferring traits in individuals with social and political dominance and question his conceptions of human welfare, inferiority, and criminality. Certain combinations of competence and forcefulness arise in real-world settings, and they produce a range of outcomes not all of which are either inevitable or desirable.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Reply to Keita.Michael Levin & Max Hocutt - 2001 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 31 (3):395-403.
The Independence Results of Set Theory: An Informal Exposition.Michael E. Levin & Margarita R. Levin - 1978 - Synthese 38 (1):1 - 34.
Flagpoles, Shadows and Deductive Explanation.Michael E. Levin & Margarita Rosa Levin - 1977 - Philosophical Studies 32 (3):293 - 299.
The Modal Confusion in Rawls' Original Position.Michael E. Levin & Margarita Levin - 1979 - Analysis 39 (2):82 - 87.
Lavoisier's Slow Burn.Michael E. Levin & Margarita R. Levin - 1978 - Philosophy of Science 45 (4):626-629.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads16 ( #301,285 of 2,177,988 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #317,698 of 2,177,988 )
How can I increase my downloads?