Res Publica 6 (3):301-319 (2000)
This paper explores an internal relation between wrong-doing and the ability to think in moral terms, through Hobbes ’ thought. I use his neglected retelling of our ‘original sin’ as a springboard, seeing how we then discover a need to vindicate our own projects in terms shared by others. We become normatively demanding creatures: greedy for normative vindication, eager to judge others amid the difficulties of our world. However there is, of course, no choice for us but to choose our own principles of judgment, or at least some authority to provide these. Unconvinced by Hobbes ’ remedies, I conclude with one implication for moral philosophy@ a need to look rather differently at agency and responsibility
|Keywords||agency Hobbes moral conflict responsibility|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Kant Against Hobbes in Theory and Practice.Patrick Riley - 2007 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 4 (2):194-206.
Kant Against Hobbes: Reasoning and Rhetoric.Gabriella Slomp - 2007 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 4 (2):207-222.
A Novel Interpretation of Plato's Theory of Forms.P. X. Monaghan - 2010 - Metaphysica 11 (1):63-78.
The Contemporary Significance of Confucianism.Tang Yijie & Yan Xin - 2008 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 3 (4):477-501.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads24 ( #211,658 of 2,171,972 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #326,556 of 2,171,972 )
How can I increase my downloads?