Non‐adjacent Dependency Learning in Humans and Other Animals

Topics in Cognitive Science 12 (3):843-858 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Wilson et al. focus on one class of AGL tasks: the cognitively demanding task of detecting non‐adjacent dependencies (NADs) among items. They provide a typology of the different types of NADs in natural languages and in AGL tasks. A range of cues affect NAD learning, ranging from the variability and number of intervening elements to the presence of shared prosodic cues between the dependent items. These cues, important for humans to discover non‐adjacent dependencies, are also found to facilitate NAD learning in several nonhuman animal species.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,252

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Being Humans When We Are Animals.Pär Segerdahl - 2014 - Nordic Wittgenstein Review 3 (2):125-149.
Kant on Animals.Patrick Kain - 2018 - In Peter Adamson & G. Fay Edwards (eds.), Animals: A History (Oxford Philosophical Concepts). New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 211-232.
Culture in humans and other animals.Grant Ramsey - 2013 - Biology and Philosophy 28 (3):457-479.
Disability, dependency and indebtedness?John Vorhaus - 2007 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 41 (1):29–44.
Atomistic learning in non-modular systems.Pierre Poirier - 2005 - Philosophical Psychology 18 (3):313-325.
Animals, handicapped children and the tragedy of marginal cases.J. L. Nelson - 1988 - Journal of Medical Ethics 14 (4):191-193.
Animal Rights and the Problem of Proximity.David E. W. Fenner - 1998 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 12 (1):51-61.
Humans, animals, and metaphors.Andrew Goatly - 2006 - Society and Animals 14 (1):15-37.


Added to PP

76 (#211,375)

6 months
8 (#303,628)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?