New data on the representation of women in philosophy journals: 2004–2015

Philosophical Studies 175 (6):1441-1464 (2018)

Authors
Isaac Wilhelm
Rutgers University - New Brunswick
Abstract
This paper presents new data on the representation of women who publish in 25 top philosophy journals as ranked by the Philosophical Gourmet Report for the years 2004, 2014, and 2015. It also provides a new analysis of Schwitzgebel’s 1955–2015 journal data. The paper makes four points while providing an overview of the current state of women authors in philosophy. In all years and for all journals, the percentage of female authors was extremely low, in the range of 14–16%. The percentage of women authors is less than the percentage of women faculty in different ranks and at different kinds of institutions. In addition, there is great variation across individual journals, and the discrepancy between women authors and women faculty appears to be different in different subfields. Interestingly, journals which do not practice anonymous review seem to have a higher percentage of women authors than journals which practice double anonymous or triple anonymous review. This paper also argues that we need more data on academic publishing to better understand whether this can explain why there are so few full-time female faculty in philosophy, since full-time hiring and tenuring practices presumably depend on a candidate’s academic publishing.
Keywords Feminist philosophy  Women authors
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11098-017-0919-0
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 44,017
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

What Do Philosophers Believe?David Bourget & David J. Chalmers - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 170 (3):465-500.
How is This Paper Philosophy?Kristie Dotson - 2013 - Comparative Philosophy 3 (1):3-29.
Ranking Exercises in Philosophy and Implicit Bias.Jennifer Saul - 2012 - Journal of Social Philosophy 43 (3):256-273.

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Why So Low?Anna Leuschner - 2019 - Metaphilosophy 50 (3):231-249.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

“I Thought Philosophy Was a Girl Thing”.Barbara Grant - 2002 - Teaching Philosophy 25 (3):213-226.
What’s Behind the Hyphen? A Response to Publish Yet Perish.Herner Saeverot - 2014 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 33 (6):673-677.
Fake Journals: Not Always Valid Ways to Distinguish Them.Khaled Moustafa - 2015 - Science and Engineering Ethics 21 (5):1391-1392.
Gender and Philosophical Intuition.Wesley Buckwalter & Stephen Stich - 2013 - In Joshua Knobe & Shaun Nichols (eds.), Experimental Philosophy, Vol.2. Oxford University Press. pp. 307-346.
Journals of Semiotics in the World.Kalevi Kull & Timo Maran - 2013 - Sign Systems Studies 41 (1):140-145.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-05-24

Total views
59 ( #140,257 of 2,266,788 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #115,429 of 2,266,788 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature