Natural Right in Hobbes and Kant

Hobbes Studies 25 (1):66-90 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Both Hobbes and Kant tackle the issue of natural right in a radical and controversial way. They both present systematic, secular theories of natural law in a highly religious age. Whereas Hobbes transforms natural right by placing the rational individual bent on self-preservation at the centre of political philosophy, Kant transforms natural right by putting the metaphysical presuppositions of his critical philosophy at the heart of his reasoning on politics. Neither attempts to provide an orthodox view of natural right as directly or indirectly derived from God's commands, although subsequent to their philosophical deduction as natural rights or laws both do not entirely repudiate the idea that these rights or laws can be portrayed as having divine support

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,174

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Kant Against Hobbes: Reasoning and Rhetoric.Gabriella Slomp - 2007 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 4 (2):207-222.
On Thomas Hobbes's Fallible Natural Law Theory.Michael Cuffaro - 2011 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 28 (2):175-190.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-06-16

Downloads
61 (#192,273)

6 months
2 (#275,027)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Kant and Natural Law Ethics.J. B. Schneewind - 1993 - Ethics 104 (1):53-74.

Add more references