Ontological disproof of God's existence

Australasian Journal of Philosophy 70 (2):204 – 210 (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

An initial reading of Hume's Principle is that no necessary truth can be denied without contradiction, whereas all existential propositions can. Therefore it is self-contradictory to say,that any existential claim is necessarily true, since it follows that this claim both can and cannot be denied without self-contradiction. Thus any claim of the form 'X necessarily exists' is a self-contradiction, even if X is God

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Some Ontological Arguments.Hugh S. Chandler - 1993 - Faith and Philosophy 10 (1):18-32.
Does God's existence need proof?Richard Messer - 1993 - New York: Oxford University Press.
The Ontological Disproof of the Vacuum.C. J. F. Williams - 1984 - Philosophy 59 (229):382 - 384.
An Answer of Behalf of Guanilo.Iddo Landau - 1992 - Philosophy and Theology 7 (1):81-96.
The ontological argument and the devil.Yujin Nagasawa - 2010 - Philosophical Quarterly 60 (238):72-91.
Alvin Plantinga on the ontological argument.William L. Rowe - 2009 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 65 (2):87 - 92.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
45 (#344,258)

6 months
3 (#1,023,809)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John N. Williams
Singapore Management University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references