‘Out of sight, out of mind?’: The Daniel Turner-James Blondel dispute over the power of the maternal imagination

Annals of Science 49 (1):63-85 (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the late 1720s, Daniel Turner and James Blondel engaged in a pamphlet dispute over the power of the maternal imagination. Turner accepted the long-standing belief that a pregnant woman's imagination could be transferred to her unborn child, imprinting the foetus with various marks and deformities. Blondel sought to refute this view on rational and anatomical grounds. Two issues repeatedly received these authors' attention: the identity of imagination, and its power in pregnant women; and the process of generation and foetal development. In their discussions of these issues, differences between the authors' acceptance of general medical theories and philosophies became apparent. Blondel invoked Newtonian matter theory, experimental philosophy, and iatro-mechanism, while Turner adhered more to the authority of the Ancients and advocated a more direct role for the Creator as an alternative to mechanism in explaining natural phenomena. Additionally, the authors held differing views of what they regarded as experience. The widespread contemporary interest in their dispute suggests that Turner and Blondel raised the phenomenon of the maternal imagination from an issue of folk belief to a concern of eighteenth-century medicine.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Out of Sight, Out of Mind.Dominic McIver Lopes - 2003 - In Matthew Kieran & Dominic McIver Lopes (eds.), Imagination, Philosophy, and the Arts.
Experiential Pluralism and the Power of Perception.Mark Eli Kalderon - 2018 - In John Collins & Tamara Dobler (eds.), The Philosophy of Charles Travis, Language, Thought, and Perception. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. pp. 222-236.
Kant and the power of imagination (review).Daniel Guevara - 2009 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 47 (4):pp. 629-630.
Flexing the imagination.James Harold - 2003 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 61 (3):247–258.
Turner on Reason and Proving God’s Existence.Bruce Milem - 2007 - Philosophy and Theology 19 (1-2):79-94.
Comment by James Turner Johnson.James Turner Johnson - 2000 - Journal of Religious Ethics 28 (2):331-335.
Did the Old South have a Mind of Its Own?James Turner - 2005 - Modern Intellectual History 2 (1):121-133.
Recreative Minds: Imagination in Philosophy and Psychology.Gregory Currie & Ian Ravenscroft - 2002 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press. Edited by Christoph Hoerl.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-20

Downloads
29 (#474,681)

6 months
4 (#320,252)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?