Praise and blame.

Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This encyclopedia entry contrasts three influential philosophical accounts of our everyday practices of praise and blame, in terms of how they might be justified. On the one hand, a broadly Kantian approach sees responsibility for actions as relying on forms of self-control that point back to the idea of free will. On this account praise and blame are justified because a person freely chooses her actions. Praise and blame respond to the person as the chooser of her deed; they recognise her dignity as a rational agent, as Kantians tend to put it. This approach sharply contrasts with two further ways of thinking about the issues. One is utilitarian, where praise and blame are justified in terms of their social benefits. Another, more complex approach is roughly Aristotelian. This approach situates practices of praise and blame in terms of our on-going relationships with one another. This approach stresses the importance of mutual accountability, moral education, and assessments of character in terms of the many vices and virtues.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,953

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Praise and Blame.Daniel J. Miller - 2022 - 1000-Word Philosophy.
Passing judgment: praise and blame in everyday life.Terri Apter - 2018 - New York: W. W. Norton & Company, Independent Publishers Since 1923.
In Praise of Blame.Barbara Houston - 1992 - Hypatia 7 (4):128 - 147.
Free Will, Praise and Blame.J. J. C. Smart - 1982 - In Gary Watson (ed.), Free will. New York: Oxford University Press.
In Praise of Blame.George Sher - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 137 (1):19-30.
Praise and Blame. [REVIEW]Peter Byrne - 2005 - Faith and Philosophy 22 (4):503-504.
Summary of Praise and Blame.Daniel N. Robinson - 2003 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 23 (1):2-7.
Praise and Blame. [REVIEW]Peter Byrne - 2005 - Faith and Philosophy 22 (4):503-504.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
157 (#124,585)

6 months
12 (#243,409)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Garrath Williams
Lancaster University

Citations of this work

On the significance of praise.Nathan Stout - 2020 - American Philosophical Quarterly 57 (3):215-226.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references