Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 11 (4):337-358 (2001)

Abstract
: It has recently become known that, in Liverpool and elsewhere, parts of children's bodies were taken postmortem and used for research without the parents being told. But should parental consent be sought before using children's corpses for medical purposes? This paper presents the view that parental consent is overrated. Arguments are rejected for consent from dead children's interests, property rights, family autonomy, and religious freedom. The only direct reason to get parental consent is to avoid distressing the parents, which carries implications for the consent process, secret harvesting of body parts, and the weight to be given to parental feelings
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1353/ken.2001.0032
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 55,909
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Individual and Family Decisions About Organ Donation.T. M. Wilkinson - 2007 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 24 (1):26–40.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
57 ( #173,089 of 2,402,081 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #105,108 of 2,402,081 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes