International Journal of Philosophical Studies 17 (1):49 – 70 (2009)
Recently, there has been some discussion about the relationship between Kant's conception of right (the sphere of juridical rights and duties) and his moral theory (with the Categorical Imperative as its fundamental norm). In section 1, I briefly survey some recent contributions to this debate and distinguish between two different questions. First, does Kant's moral theory (as developed in the Groundwork and the Critique of Practical Reason ) imply , or validate, a Kantian conception of right (as developed in the first part of the Metaphysics of Morals , the Doctrine of Right)? In other words, is the Categorical Imperative sufficient to show that the fundamental principles of right are normatively valid? Second, does Kant's conception of right presuppose his moral theory? In other words, is the Categorical Imperative necessary to show that the basic principles of right are normatively valid? In this paper, I will be primarily concerned with defending a negative answer to the first of these questions. In section 2, I will discuss Paul Guyer's attempt to vindicate a positive answer to the same question. In section 3, reasons will be given why any attempt to derive Kant's conception of right from the Categorical Imperative must fail because of the analytic connection between right and coercion.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Kant’s Metaphysics of Ethics: Interpretive Essays.Mark Timmons (ed.) - 2002 - Oxford University Press.
Kant's Deductions of the Principles of Right.Paul Guyer - 2002 - In Mark Timmons (ed.), Kant's Metaphysics of Morals: Interpretative Essays. Clarendon Press.
Why The Doctrine Of Right Does Not Belong In The Metaphysics Of Morals.Marcus Willaschek - 1997 - Jahrbuch für Recht Und Ethik 5.
Which Imperatives for Right? On the Non-Prescriptive Character of Juridicial Laws in Kant's Metaphysics of Morals.Marcus Willaschek - 2002 - In Mark Timmons (ed.), Kant's Metaphysics of Morals: Interpretative Essays. Clarendon Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
The Education of the Categorical Imperative.James Scott Johnston - 2006 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 25 (5-6):385-402.
Acting From Duty: Inclination, Reason and Moral Worth.Jens Timmermann - 2009 - In Kant's Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals: A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press.
How Does Kant Justify the Universal Objective Validity of the Law of Right?Gerhard Seel - 2009 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 17 (1):71 – 94.
Categorical Imperatives, Moral Requirements, and Moral Motivation.Xiaomei Yang - 2006 - Metaphilosophy 37 (1):112–129.
Practical Reason: Categorical Imperative, Maxims, Laws.Kenneth R. Westphal - 2010 - In W. Dudley & K. Engelhard (eds.), Kant: Key Concepts. Acumen Publishing.
Unifying the Categorical Imperative.Marcus Arvan - 2012 - Southwest Philosophy Review 28 (1):217-225.
Sapere Aude! The Importance of a Moral Education in Kant's Doctrine of Virtue.Lee Anne Peck - 2007 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 22 (2 & 3):208 – 214.
Added to index2009-03-08
Total downloads114 ( #40,125 of 2,059,555 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #119,851 of 2,059,555 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.