Robert A. Millikan meets the credibility revolution: comment on Harrison , ‘field experiments and methodological intolerance’1

Journal of Economic Methodology 23 (2):130-138 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Millikan's famous oil drop experiment is scrutinized from the viewpoint of the methodological dicta of the credibility revolution.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/1350178x.2016.1158950

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Robert A. Millikan meets the credibility revolution: comment on Harrison , ‘field experiments and methodological intolerance’.Nathaniel T. Wilcox - forthcoming - Journal of Economic Methodology:1-9.
Robert A. Millikan meets the credibility revolution.Nathaniel T. Wilcox - forthcoming - Journal of Economic Methodology.
Methodological ignorance: A comment on field experiments and methodological intolerance.Marcel Boumans - 2016 - Journal of Economic Methodology 23 (2):139-146.
Experiments, policy, and theory in development economics: a response to Glenn Harrison’s ‘field experiments and methodological intolerance’.Thomas Bossuroy & Clara Delavallade - 2016 - Journal of Economic Methodology 23 (2):147-156.
Field experiments and methodological intolerance: reply.Glenn W. Harrison - 2016 - Journal of Economic Methodology 23 (2):157-159.
Introduction to discussion forum on Glenn W. Harrison’s ‘field experiments and methodological intolerance’.Don Ross - 2016 - Journal of Economic Methodology 23 (2):127-129.
The Conservative Mode: Robert A. Millikan and the Twentieth-Century Revolution in Physics.Robert Kargon - 1977 - Isis 68:508-526.
Millikan and her critics.Dan Ryder, Justine Kingsbury & Kenneth Williford (eds.) - 2013 - Malden, MA: Wiley.
Good to the last drop? Millikan stories as “canned” pedagogy.Dr Ullica Segerstråle - 1995 - Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (3):197-214.
The methodological defense of realism scrutinized.K. Brad Wray - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 54:74-79.
Methodological Problems in the Investigation of the Contemporary Scientific-Technical Revolution and the Forming of the New Human Being.V. I. Shinkaruk - 1976 - Russian Studies in Philosophy 15 (1):4-8.
Poet in the atomic age: Robert Frost's ‘That Millikan Mote’ expanded.B. J. Sokol - 1996 - Annals of Science 53 (4):399-411.
An appraisal of the controversial nature of the oil drop experiment: Is closure possible?Mansoor Niaz - 2005 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (4):681-702.
Comments on "Millikan's compromised externalism".Ruth G. Millikan - 2004 - In Richard Schantz (ed.), The Externalist Challenge. De Gruyter.
Constructing a ‘revolution in science’: the campaign to promote a favourable reception for the 1919 solar eclipse experiments.Alistair Sponsel - 2002 - British Journal for the History of Science 35 (4):439-467.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-05-19

Downloads
13 (#978,482)

6 months
5 (#544,079)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Nathaniel Wilcox
Chapman University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references