Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 41 (2):174-181 (2010)
In various debates about science, appeal is made to the freedom of scientific research. A rationale in favor of this freedom is rarely offered. In this paper, two major arguments are reconstructed that promise to lend support to a principle of scientific freedom. According to the epistemological argument, freedom of research is required in order to organize the collective cognitive effort we call science efficiently. According to the political argument, scientific knowledge needs to be generated in ways that are independent of the major political powers because of the important role it plays for the citizens and their capacity to form well-informed political preferences. Both arguments are examined critically in order to identify their strengths and limitations. I argue that the scientific freedom established by both rests on a number of critical preconditions, and that the arguments’ force must be weighed against competing societal interests and values in each case of their application. Appeal to a principle of scientific freedom should therefore never mark the end, but rather the beginning of a public debate about the ends and means of science.
|Keywords||freedom of research science policy academic freedom|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
On Liberty.Mill John Stuart - 1956 - In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Philosophical Quarterly. Oxford University Press. pp. 519-522.
Delibration and Democratic Legitimacy.Joshua Cohen - 2003 - In Derek Matravers & Jonathan E. Pike (eds.), Debates in Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Anthology. Routledge, in Association with the Open University.
Science, Democracy, and the Right to Research.Mark B. Brown & David H. Guston - 2009 - Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (3):351-366.
Citations of this work BETA
The Irreducibility of Value-Freedom to Theory Assessment.Anke Bueter - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 49:18-26.
The Eagle and the Starlings: Galileo's Argument for the Autonomy of Science—How Pertinent is It Today?Hugh Lacey & Pablo R. Mariconda - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 43 (1):122-131.
Similar books and articles
Scientific Autonomy and Planned Research: The Case of Space Science.Torsten Wilholt - 2006 - Poiesis and Praxis 4 (4):253-265.
At Arm's Length? Applied Social Science and its Sponsors.Heidi Kjærnet - 2010 - Journal of Academic Ethics 8 (3):161-169.
Teaching in Colorado: Not a Rocky Mountain High; Academic Freedom in a Climate of Repression.Alison M. Jaggar - 2007 - Teaching Philosophy 30 (2):149-172.
Ought Research to Be Unrestricted?Michael Dummett - 1981 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 12:281-298.
Ethics, Academic Freedom and Academic Tenure.Richard T. De George - 2003 - Journal of Academic Ethics 1 (1):11-25.
Scientific Essentialism, Could've Done Otherwise, And the Possibility of Freedom.Erik Anderson - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 15:13-20.
Academic Freedom and Academic-Industry Relationships in Biotechnology.Robert Streiffer - 2006 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 16 (2):129-149.
Added to index2010-09-14
Total downloads35 ( #140,777 of 2,146,801 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #120,194 of 2,146,801 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.