Authors
Torsten Wilholt
Universität Hannover
Abstract
In various debates about science, appeal is made to the freedom of scientific research. A rationale in favor of this freedom is rarely offered. In this paper, two major arguments are reconstructed that promise to lend support to a principle of scientific freedom. According to the epistemological argument, freedom of research is required in order to organize the collective cognitive effort we call science efficiently. According to the political argument, scientific knowledge needs to be generated in ways that are independent of the major political powers because of the important role it plays for the citizens and their capacity to form well-informed political preferences. Both arguments are examined critically in order to identify their strengths and limitations. I argue that the scientific freedom established by both rests on a number of critical preconditions, and that the arguments’ force must be weighed against competing societal interests and values in each case of their application. Appeal to a principle of scientific freedom should therefore never mark the end, but rather the beginning of a public debate about the ends and means of science.
Keywords freedom of research  science policy  academic freedom
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1016/j.shpsa.2010.03.003
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 60,992
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Fate of Knowledge.Helen E. Longino - 2001 - Princeton University Press.
Science, Truth, and Democracy.Philip Kitcher - 2001 - Oxford University Press.

View all 31 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Irreducibility of Value-Freedom to Theory Assessment.Anke Bueter - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 49:18-26.
Science, Institutions, and Values.C. Mantzavinos - 2021 - European Journal of Philosophy 29 (2):379-392.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

At Arm’s Length? Applied Social Science and its Sponsors.Heidi Kjærnet - 2010 - Journal of Academic Ethics 8 (3):161-169.
The Problem of Freedom.Mary T. Clark (ed.) - 1973 - New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
What Freedom Is.Wells Earl Draughon - 2003 - Writer's Showcase.
Ought Research to Be Unrestricted?Michael Dummett - 1981 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 12 (1):281-298.
Ethics, Academic Freedom and Academic Tenure.Richard T. De George - 2003 - Journal of Academic Ethics 1 (1):11-25.
Scientific Essentialism, Could’Ve Done Otherwise, And the Possibility of Freedom.Erik Anderson - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 15:13-20.
Academic Freedom and Academic-Industry Relationships in Biotechnology.Robert Streiffer - 2006 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 16 (2):129-149.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-09-14

Total views
104 ( #100,654 of 2,439,408 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #209,215 of 2,439,408 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes