Dissertation, Rutgers University - New Brunswick (2021)

Authors
Christopher Willard-Kyle
University of Glasgow
Abstract
Knowledge is good, ignorance is bad. So it seems, anyway. But in this dissertation, I argue that some ignorance is epistemically valuable. Sometimes, we should suspend judgment even though by believing we would achieve knowledge. In this apology for ignorance (ignorance, that is, of a certain kind), I defend the following four theses: 1) Sometimes, we should continue inquiry in ignorance, even though we are in a position to know the answer, in order to achieve more than mere knowledge (e.g. understanding) while minimizing the effects of confirmation bias. 2) It’s false that we should believe every proposition such that we are guaranteed to be right about it (and even such that we are guaranteed to know it) if we believe it. 3) Being in a position to know is the norm of assertion: importantly, this does not require belief or (thereby) knowledge, and so proper assertion can survive speaker-ignorance. 4) It can be permissible and conversationally useful to tell audiences things that it is logically impossible for them to come to know: Proper assertion can survive (necessary) audience-side ignorance. Cumulatively, this project suggests that, properly understood, ignorance has an important role to play in the good epistemic life.
Keywords Ignorance  Inquiry  Infallibility  Assertion  Moorean Paradoxes  Norms of Assertion  Knowledge  Delayed Gratification
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Thinking, Fast and Slow.Daniel Kahneman - 2011 - New York: New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Intention.G. E. M. Anscombe - 1957 - Harvard University Press.

View all 129 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Epistemic Dimensions of Ignorance.Rik Peels & Martijn Blaauw (eds.) - 2016 - Cambridge University Press.
The Practice of Assertion Under Conditions of Religious Ignorance.Aaron Rizzieri - 2017 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 9 (1):27--39.
Educating for Ignorance.Rik Peels & Duncan Pritchard - 2020 - Synthese 198 (8):7949-7963.
Ignorance and Its Disvalue.Anne Meylan - 2020 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 97 (3):433-447.
On Ignorance: A Reply to Peels.Pierre LeMorvan - 2011 - Philosophia 39 (2):335-344.
You Gotta Believe.John Turri - 2014 - In Clayton Littlejohn & John Turri (eds.), Epistemic norms: new essays on action, belief and assertion. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. pp. 193-199.
Assertion and Its Many Norms.John N. Williams - 2017 - Manuscrito 40 (4):39-76.
What is Ignorance?Rik Peels - 2010 - Philosophia 38 (1):57-67.
Culpable Ignorance in a Collective Setting.Säde Hormio - 2018 - Acta Philosophica Fennica 94:7-34.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-11-05

Total views
179 ( #64,574 of 2,499,037 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
47 ( #17,943 of 2,499,037 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes