Journal of Moral Philosophy 8 (3):390-414 (2011)
If a disabled newborn infant dies, her parents may be able to conceive another child without impairment. This is sometimes referred to as 'replacement'. Some philosophers have argued that replacement provides a strong reason for disabled newborns to be killed or allowed to die. In this paper I focus on the case for replacement as it relates to decisions about life support in newborn intensive care. I argue (following Jeff McMahan) that the impersonal reason to replace is weak and easily outweighed. I assess and reject several possible ways in which the impersonal reason to replace could be defended. I then address an alternative justification for replacement - as an individual-affecting benefit. The strongest justification for replacement may be the interests of parents. In the latter part of the paper I look at a related question. What role should replacement play in decisions about the funding of newborn intensive care?
|Keywords||IMPERSONAL REASONS UTILITARIANISM WITHDRAWING TREATMENT NEWBORNS REPLACEMENT|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
A Life Worth Giving? The Threshold for Permissible Withdrawal of Life Support From Disabled Newborn Infants.Dominic James Wilkinson - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (2):20 - 32.
The Window of Opportunity: Decision Theory and the Timing of Prognostic Tests for Newborn Infants.Dominic Wilkinson - 2009 - Bioethics 23 (9):503-514.
Which Newborn Infants Are Too Expensive to Treat? Camosy and Rationing in Intensive Care.D. Wilkinson - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (8):502-506.
Harm and Uncertainty in Newborn Intensive Care.Kenneth Kipnis - 2007 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 28 (5):393-412.
Knowledge or Understanding? Informed Choice in the Context of Newborn Bloodspot Screening.S. G. Nicholls - 2010 - Public Health Ethics 3 (2):128-136.
Should We Replace Knowledge by Understanding? — A Comment on Elgin and Goodman's Reconception of Epistemology.Dirk Koppelberg - 1993 - Synthese 95 (1):119 - 128.
Death by Non-Feeding: Not in the Baby's Best Interests. [REVIEW]Helga Kuhse - 1986 - Journal of Medical Humanities and Bioethics 7 (2):79-90.
Quality-of-Life Considerations in Substitute Decision-Making for Severely Disabled Neonates: The Problem of Developing Awareness.Eike-Henner W. Kluge - 2009 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 30 (5):351-366.
'They Say Islam has a Solution for Everything, so Why Are There No Guidelines for This?' Ethical Dilemmas Associated with the Births and Deaths of Infants with Fatal Abnormalities From a Small Sample of Pakistani Muslim Couples in Britain.Alison Shaw - 2012 - Bioethics 26 (9):485-492.
Legal Issues in Treating Critically Ill Newborn Infants.Loane Skene - 1993 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2 (3):295.
Newborn Infants with Severe Defects: A Survey of Paediatric Attitudes and Practices in the United Kingdom.Carole Outterson - 1993 - Bioethics 7 (5):420-435.
Added to index2011-10-18
Total downloads19 ( #258,456 of 2,168,179 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #346,757 of 2,168,179 )
How can I increase my downloads?