Should We Replace Disabled Newborn Infants?

Journal of Moral Philosophy 8 (3):390-414 (2011)
Abstract
If a disabled newborn infant dies, her parents may be able to conceive another child without impairment. This is sometimes referred to as 'replacement'. Some philosophers have argued that replacement provides a strong reason for disabled newborns to be killed or allowed to die. In this paper I focus on the case for replacement as it relates to decisions about life support in newborn intensive care. I argue (following Jeff McMahan) that the impersonal reason to replace is weak and easily outweighed. I assess and reject several possible ways in which the impersonal reason to replace could be defended. I then address an alternative justification for replacement - as an individual-affecting benefit. The strongest justification for replacement may be the interests of parents. In the latter part of the paper I look at a related question. What role should replacement play in decisions about the funding of newborn intensive care?
Keywords IMPERSONAL REASONS   UTILITARIANISM   WITHDRAWING TREATMENT   NEWBORNS   REPLACEMENT
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1163/174552411X591348
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,553
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Harm and Uncertainty in Newborn Intensive Care.Kenneth Kipnis - 2007 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 28 (5):393-412.
Death by Non-Feeding: Not in the Baby's Best Interests. [REVIEW]Helga Kuhse - 1986 - Journal of Medical Humanities and Bioethics 7 (2):79-90.
Computing Machinery and Morality.Blay Whitby - 2007 - AI and Society 22 (4):551-563.
Legal Issues in Treating Critically Ill Newborn Infants.Loane Skene - 1993 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2 (3):295.
Can Infants Have Interests in Continued Life?Chris Kaposy - 2007 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 28 (4):301-330.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-10-18

Total downloads

19 ( #258,456 of 2,168,179 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #346,757 of 2,168,179 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums