Transhumanism and moral equality

Bioethics 21 (8):419–425 (2007)
Authors
James Wilson
University College London
Abstract
Conservative thinkers such as Francis Fukuyama have produced a battery of objections to the transhumanist project of fundamentally enhancing human capacities. This article examines one of these objections, namely that by allowing some to greatly extend their capacities, we will undermine the fundamental moral equality of human beings. I argue that this objection is groundless: once we understand the basis for human equality, it is clear that anyone who now has sufficient capacities to count as a person from the moral point of view will continue to count as one even if others are fundamentally enhanced; and it is mistaken to think that a creature which had even far greater capacities than an unenhanced human being should count as more than an equal from the moral point of view.
Keywords Kant  transhumanism  moral equality  enhancement  Singer problem  Francis Fukuyama  John Rawls
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2007.00579.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 35,475
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

In Defense of Posthuman Dignity.Nick Bostrom - 2005 - Bioethics 19 (3):202–214.
Moral Equality and Natural Inferiority.Laurence Thomas - 2005 - Social Theory and Practice 31 (3):379-404.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Human Enhancement and Supra-Personal Moral Status.Thomas Douglas - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 162 (3):473-497.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
141 ( #42,517 of 2,286,242 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #66,571 of 2,286,242 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature