The advantages of theft over toil: The design inference and arguing from ignorance [Book Review]

Biology and Philosophy 16 (5):711-724 (2001)
Intelligent design theorist William Dembski has proposed an ``explanatory filter'' for distinguishing between events due to chance,lawful regularity or design. We show that if Dembski's filter were adopted as a scientific heuristic, some classical developments in science would not be rational, and that Dembski's assertion that the filter reliably identifies rarefied design requires ignoring the state of background knowledge. If background information changes even slightly, the filter's conclusion will vary wildly. Dembski fails to overcome Hume's objections to arguments from design.
Keywords Bayesian inference  Darwin  Dembski  intelligent design  natural selection
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1023/A:1012282323054
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,727
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index

Total downloads
108 ( #48,005 of 2,197,335 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #298,877 of 2,197,335 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature