Classical Quarterly 45 (01):58- (1995)

In a recent article, C. H. Kahn addresses an ‘old scholarly myth’, namely the idea that Book I of the Republic began life as an earlier, independent dialogue and was subsequently adapted to serve as a prelude to the much longer work that we know. The case for this hypothesis rests both on stylometric considerations and on the many ‘Socratic’ features that Book I, unlike the rest of the Republic, shares with Plato's earlier works. Having disposed of the positive arguments in favour of the ‘myth’, Kahn turns to the contrary—and in his view overwhelming—evidence that Book I was composed from the start as an integral part of the longer Republic. He catalogues 12 passages in Book I, accounting for roughly half its length, whose full significance will, he argues, only emerge if they are seen as instances of prolepsis, deliberate anticipations of what is to come in later books
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0009838800041689
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 61,025
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Republic of Plato.James Adam - 1903 - Journal of Hellenic Studies 23:207.
Socrates and Thrasymachus.F. E. Sparshott - 1966 - The Monist 50 (3):421-459.
Thrasymachus --- or Plato?Joseph P. Maguire - 1971 - Phronesis 16 (2):142 - 163.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
32 ( #332,985 of 60,983 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #433,243 of 60,983 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes