Philosophy of Science 71 (3):380-401 (2004)
The evolution of the myxoma virus in Australia has been presented for many years as a test case for the hypothesis that group selection can function effectively `in the wild.' This paper critically examines the myxoma case, and argues that its failure as a test case for this hypothesis has broader implications for debates over the levels of selection
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Heuristics and Meta-Heuristics in Scientific Judgement.Spencer Phillips Hey - 2016 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 67 (2):471-495.
Similar books and articles
To Test or Not to Test: A Clinical Dilemma.David B. Resnik - 1995 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 16 (2).
Evaluation of Evidence in Group Selection Debates.Elisabeth A. Lloyd - 1986 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:483 - 493.
A Novel Interpretation of Plato's Theory of Forms.P. X. Monaghan - 2010 - Metaphysica 11 (1):63-78.
Taken by Surprise: The Paradox of the Surprise Test Revisited. [REVIEW]Joseph Y. Halpern & Yoram Moses - 1986 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 15 (3):281 - 304.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads36 ( #141,157 of 2,158,194 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #356,322 of 2,158,194 )
How can I increase my downloads?