The inscrutability of reference

Dissertation, University of St Andrews (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The metaphysics of representation poses questions such as: in virtue of what does a sentence, picture, or mental state represent that the world is a certain way? In the first instance, I have focused on the semantic properties of language: for example, what is it for a name such as ‘London’ to refer to something? Interpretationism concerning what it is for linguistic expressions to have meaning, says that constitutively, semantic facts are fixed by best semantic theory. As here developed, it promises to give a reductive, universal and non-revisionary account of the nature of linguistic representation. Interpretationism in general, however, is threatened by severe internal tension, due to arguments for radical inscrutability. These contend that, given the interpretationist setting, there can be no fact of the matter what object an individual word refers to: for example, that there is no fact of the matter as to whether “London” refers to London or to Sydney. A series of challenges emerge, forming the basis for this thesis. 1. What sort of properties is the interpretationist trying to reduce, and what kind of reductive story is she offering? 2. How are inscrutability theses best formulated? Are arguments for inscrutability effective in their own terms? What kinds of inscrutability arise? 3. Is endorsing radical inscrutability a stable position? 4. Are there theoretical virtues—such as simplicity—that can be appealed to in discrediting the rival (empirically equivalent) theories that underpin inscrutability arguments? In addressing these questions, I concentrate on diagnosing the source of inscrutability, mapping the space of ways of resisting the arguments for radical inscrutability, and examining the challenges faced in developing a principled account of linguistic content that avoids radical inscrutability. The effect is not to close down the original puzzles, but rather to sharpen them into a set of new and deeper challenges.



External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Inscrutability Of Reference In Donald Davidson’s Theory Of Meaning.Anna Rykowska - 2008 - Studia Philosophica Wratislaviensia 3 (1):61-78.
The Ontological Significance of Inscrutability.Matti Eklund - 2007 - Philosophical Topics 35 (1-2):115-134.
Inscrutability and visual objects.Ben Phillips - 2017 - Synthese 194 (8):2949-2971.
The Indeterminacy of Translation and the Inscrutability of Reference.Scott Soames - 1999 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 29 (3):321-370.
Inscrutability and ontological commitment.Berit Brogaard - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 141 (1):21 - 42.
Quine's Thesis of Referential Inscrutability.I. Dean Beebe - 1988 - Dissertation, Boston University
Fodor on inscrutability.Jerome C. Wakefield - 2003 - Mind and Language 18 (5):524-537.
Ontological Relativity in Quine and Davidson.J. E. Malpas - 1989 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 36 (1):157-178.
Eligibility and inscrutability.J. Robert G. Williams - 2007 - Philosophical Review 116 (3):361-399.
Fodor on Inscrutability.Jerome C. Wakefield - 2003 - Mind and Language 18 (5):524-537.
Ontological Relativity in Quine and Davidson.J. E. Malpas - 1989 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 36 (1):157-178.


Added to PP

690 (#18,127)

6 months
52 (#57,961)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Robert Williams
University of Leeds

References found in this work

Word and Object.Willard Van Orman Quine - 1960 - Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.
On the Plurality of Worlds.David Lewis - 1986 - Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell.
The Varieties of Reference.Gareth Evans - 1982 - Oxford: Oxford University Press. Edited by John Henry McDowell.

View all 300 references / Add more references