Tower of babel: The evidence against the new creationism

Australasian Journal of Philosophy 79 (2):302 – 304 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Book Information Tower of Babel: the evidence against the new creationism. By Robert T. Pennock. Bradford/MIT Press. Cambridge MA. 1999. Pp. xviii + 429.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/713659209

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Can creationism be scientific? (1998).Theodore M. Drange - unknown
The ESRC research ethics framework and research ethics review at UK universities: rebuilding the Tower of Babel REC by REC.D. L. H. Hunter - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (11):815-820.
Revisiting Babel : sport and poetry.Evan Morris Williams - unknown
A defense of creationism in fiction.Jeffrey Goodman - 2004 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 67 (1):131-155.
Naturalism, Evidence and Creationism: The Case of Phillip Johnson. [REVIEW]Robert T. Pennock - 1996 - Biology and Philosophy 11 (4):543-559.
Science at the tower of babel.T. Swann Harding - 1938 - Philosophy of Science 5 (3):338-353.
The four horsemen of downsizing and the tower of babel.Robert A. Miller - 2001 - Journal of Business Ethics 29 (1-2):147 - 151.
Whose God? What science?: Reply to Michael Behe.Robert Pennock - manuscript

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
300 (#64,791)

6 months
12 (#203,353)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John Wilkins
University of Melbourne

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references