The Possibility of an Ongoing Moral Catastrophe

Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 18 (5):971-982 (2015)
Authors
Evan Gregg Williams
University of Wisconsin, Oshkosh
Abstract
This article gives two arguments for believing that our society is unknowingly guilty of serious, large-scale wrongdoing. First is an inductive argument: most other societies, in history and in the world today, have been unknowingly guilty of serious wrongdoing, so ours probably is too. Second is a disjunctive argument: there are a large number of distinct ways in which our practices could turn out to be horribly wrong, so even if no particular hypothesized moral mistake strikes us as very likely, the disjunction of all such mistakes should receive significant credence. The article then discusses what our society should do in light of the likelihood that we are doing something seriously wrong: we should regard intellectual progress, of the sort that will allow us to find and correct our moral mistakes as soon as possible, as an urgent moral priority rather than as a mere luxury; and we should also consider it important to save resources and cultivate flexibility, so that when the time comes to change our policies we will be able to do so quickly and smoothly
Keywords Hedging  Moral mistakes  Moral uncertainty  Progress
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10677-015-9567-7
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Practical Ethics.Peter Singer - 1979 - Cambridge University Press.
The Case for Animal Rights.Tom Regan - 2009 - In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Noûs. Oxford University Press. pp. 425-434.
Famine, Affluence, and Morality.Peter Singer - 1972 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 1 (3):229-243.
Why Abortion is Immoral.Don Marquis - 1989 - Journal of Philosophy 86 (4):183-202.

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Moral Dilemmas and Moral Luck.Timothy John Dunn - 2001 - Dissertation, Rice University
The Possibility of Inductive Moral Arguments.Mark T. Nelson - 2006 - Philosophical Papers 35 (2):231-246.
Moral Mistakes, Virtue and Sin: The Case of Othello.J. Porter - 2005 - Studies in Christian Ethics 18 (2):23-44.
Moral Mistakes.Zed Adams - 2011 - Philosophical Investigations 34 (1):1-21.
Achieving Moral Progress Despite Moral Regress.Ben Dixon - 2005 - Social Philosophy Today 21:157-172.
Kant, History, and the Idea of Moral Development.Pauline Kleingeld - 1999 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 16 (1):59-80.
Honor and Moral Revolution.Victor Kumar & Richmond Campbell - 2016 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 19 (1):147-59.
Running Risks Morally.Brian Weatherson - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 167 (1):141-163.
El Intuicionismo de Prichard.Mauricio Rengifo Gardeazábal - 2005 - Ideas Y Valores 54 (127):35-53.
The Idea of Moral Progress.Michele M. Moody-Adams - 1999 - Metaphilosophy 30 (3):168-185.
What’s Wrong with Morality?C. Daniel Batson - 2011 - Emotion Review 3 (3):230-236.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-02-06

Total downloads
262 ( #17,868 of 2,293,671 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
77 ( #4,264 of 2,293,671 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature