Utilitas 29 (4):398-422 (2017)

Authors
Jeremy Williams
University of Birmingham
Abstract
This paper offers a new critical evaluation of the Rawlsian model of global public reason (‘GPR’), focusing on its ability to serve as a normative standard for guiding international diplomacy and deliberation in matters of war. My thesis is that, where war is concerned, the model manifests two fatal weaknesses. First, because it demands extensive neutrality over the moral status of persons – and in particular over whether they possess equal basic worth or value – out of respect for the beliefs of inegalitarian yet ‘decent’ societies, or ‘peoples’, Rawlsian GPR renders calculations of proportionality in war impossible. Second, because its content is provided by a conception of global justice (the so-called ‘Law of Peoples’) whose injunctions are addressed exclusively to peoples, as corporate agents, Rawlsian GPR pushes the moral evaluation of the independent wartime choices of individuals off the agenda of the global public forum altogether.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0953820816000376
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,339
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Law of Peoples.John Rawls - 2001 - Philosophical Quarterly 51 (203):246-253.
The Completeness of Public Reason.Micah Schwartzman - 2004 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 3 (2):191-220.
Justificatory Liberalism: An Essay on Epistemology and Political Theory.David Estlund - 1996 - Philosophical and Phenomenological Research 59 (3):821-825.
Rawls, Reasonableness, and International Toleration.Thomas Porter - 2012 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 11 (4):382-414.
Just Wars and Humanitarian Interventions.Rex Martin - 2005 - Journal of Social Philosophy 36 (4):439–456.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Public Reason.Jonathan Quong - 2013 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Global Public Reason, Diversity, and Consent.Samuel Director - 2019 - Philosophical Papers 48 (1):31-57.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Mutability of Public Reason.Chad Flanders - 2012 - Ratio Juris 25 (2):180-205.
Deliberation Beyond Borders: The Public Reason of a Society of Peoples.William Smith - 2011 - Journal of International Political Theory 7 (2):117-139.
Public Reason.David Gauthier - 1995 - Social Philosophy and Policy 12 (1):19-42.
Understanding the Global Ethic Project.Mats Volberg - 2012 - Public Reason 4 (1-2):18-27.
Public Justification Versus Public Deliberation: The Case for Divorce.Kevin Vallier - 2015 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 45 (2):139-158.
Public Reason and Democracy.Andrew Lister - 2008 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 11 (3):273-289.
Public Reason and Prenatal Moral Status.Jeremy Williams - 2015 - The Journal of Ethics 19 (1):23-52.
Religion and Public Reason in the Global Politics of Human Rights.Linda Hogan - 2009 - In Nigel Biggar & Linda Hogan (eds.), Religious Voices in Public Places. Oxford University Press.
Public Reason Can Be Reasonably Rejected.Franz Mang - 2017 - Social Theory and Practice 43 (2):343-367.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-04-05

Total views
16 ( #642,941 of 2,448,757 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #445,251 of 2,448,757 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes