Welcoming (auto)biography without waving away fiction

Metaphilosophy 37 (2):277–283 (2006)

Abstract
This article is a response to Ole Martin Skilleås's "Knowledge and Imagination in Fiction and Biography." The first section of the article summarizes the line of the argument in four theses: (1) What is real is more influential than what is made up; (2) there is no metaphysical chasm between autobiographers and us; (3) (auto)biographies are not just empirical; and (4) the moral lesson of a fiction need not be accepted. In the second section each of these theses is criticized. This criticism leads to the conclusion that we should welcome (auto)biographical texts in our moral investigations, but not at the cost of fictional texts. This conclusion is coupled with a proposal to formulate criteria to distinguish texts that matter from those that do not.
Keywords fiction  non‐fiction  Martha Nussbaum  moral philosophy
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9973.2006.00426.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 46,282
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Sex and Social Justice.Patrick D. Hopkins - 2000 - Hypatia 17 (2):171-173.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
21 ( #441,346 of 2,285,987 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #107,196 of 2,285,987 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature