Open Philosophy 2 (1):1-9 (2019)

Authors
Mary Beth Willard
Weber State University
Abstract
Not all public art is bad art, but when public art is bad, it tends to be bad in an identifiable way. In this paper, I develop a Waltonian theory of the category of public art, according to which public art standardly is both accessible to the public and minimally site-specific. When a work lacks the standard features of the category to which it belongs, appreciators tend to perceive the work as aesthetically flawed. I then compare and contrast cases of successful and unsuccessful public art to show that accessibility and site-specificity are features which tend to preclude the other. It is difficult, although hardly impossible, for a site-specific work to remain accessible, and difficult for an accessible work to engage adequately with the site on which it is situated. As a result, while not all public art is bad, the features peculiar to public work encourage a latent tendency toward badness.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1515/opphil-2019-0001
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,488
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Categories of Art.Kendall L. Walton - 1970 - Philosophical Review 79 (3):334-367.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Public Health and Public Goods.Jonny Anomaly - 2011 - Public Health Ethics 4 (3):251-259.
Public Health Insurance Under a Nonbenevolent State.P. Lemieux - 2008 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 33 (5):416-426.
Public Health and Normative Public Goods.Richard H. Dees - 2018 - Public Health Ethics 11 (1):20-26.
Deliberating About the Public Interest.Ian O’Flynn - 2010 - Res Publica 16 (3):299-315.
What Public? Whose Schools?John F. Covaleskie - 2007 - Educational Studies 42 (1):28-43.
On the Public.Alastair Hannay - 2005 - Routledge.
Beyond Serving a Purpose: Additional Ethical Focuses for Public Policy Agents.Vanessa Scholes - 2011 - In Jonathan Boston, Andrew Bradstock & David Eng (eds.), Ethics and public policy: contemporary issues. Victoria University Press.
Public Space in a Private Time.Vito Acconci - 1990 - Critical Inquiry 16 (4):900-918.
What is Public Opinion?Eric R. A. N. Smith - 1996 - Critical Review 10 (1):95-105.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-01-26

Total views
12 ( #715,804 of 2,326,736 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #162,231 of 2,326,736 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes