When Realism Made a Difference: The Constitution of Matter and its Conceptual Enigmas in Late 19th Century Physics

The late 19th century debate among German-speaking physicists about theoretical entities is often regarded as foreshadowing the scientific realism debate. This paper brings out differences between them by concentrating on the part of the earlier debate that was concerned with the conceptual consistency of the competing conceptions of matter—mainly, but not exclusively, of atomism. Philosophical antinomies of atomism were taken up by Emil Du Bois-Reymond in an influential lecture in 1872. Such challenges to the consistency of atomism had repercussions within the physics community, as can be shown for the examples of Heinrich Hertz and Ludwig Boltzmann. The latter developed a series of counter-arguments, culminating in an ingenious attempt to turn the tables on the critics of atomism and prove the inconsistency of non-atomistic conceptions of nature. Underlying this controversy is a disagreement over specific goals of physical research which was considered crucially relevant to the further course of physical inquiry. It thereby exemplifies an attitude towards the realism issue that can be contrasted with a different, more neutral attitude of construing the realism issue as merely philosophical and indifferent with respect to concrete research programs in physics, which one also occasionally finds expressed in the 19th century controversy and which may be seen as the prevailing attitude of the 20th century debate.
Keywords Realism  Atomism  Antinomies  Du Bois-Reymond  Boltzmann
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1016/j.shpsb.2007.04.003
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,841
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Ludwig Boltzmann's Mathematical Argument for Atomism.Torsten Wilholt - 2001 - Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 9:199-211.

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Worldviews and Physicists' Experience of Disciplinary Change: On the Uses of 'Classical' Physics.Richard Staley - 2008 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 39 (3):298-311.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index

Total downloads
50 ( #113,635 of 2,210,399 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #387,753 of 2,210,399 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature