Philosophy of Science 65 (2):267-275 (1998)

William C. Wimsatt
University of Minnesota
The simple systems methodology is a powerful reductionistic research strategy. It has problems as implemented in developmental genetics because the organisms studied are few and unrepresentative. Stronger inferences require independent arguments that key traits are widely distributed phylogenetically. Evolutionary and developmental mechanisms of generative entrenchment and self-organization provide possible support, and are also necessary components of a developmental systems approach
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/392638
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 56,999
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Mechanisms and Laws: Clarifying the Debate.Marie I. Kaiser & C. F. Craver - 2013 - In H.-K. Chao, S.-T. Chen & R. Millstein (eds.), Mechanism and Causality in Biology and Economics. Dordrecht: Springer. pp. 125-145.
The Human Genome Project.Lisa Gannett - 2009 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Systems of Ordering Data.Ernst Mayr - 1995 - Biology and Philosophy 10 (4):419-434.
Inheritance Systems.Ehud Lamm - 2012 - The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2012 Edition).
Learning to Design Systems.Gary Metcalf - 2003 - World Futures 59 (1):21 – 36.
Generative Entrenchment and Evolution.Jeffrey C. Schank & William C. Wimsatt - 1986 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:33 - 60.


Added to PP index

Total views
58 ( #171,836 of 2,410,434 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #86,626 of 2,410,434 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes