Journal of Philosophical Logic 43 (4):665-690 (2014)

Authors
Stefan Wintein
Tilburg University
Abstract
In a recent paper, Philip Kremer proposes a formal and theory-relative desideratum for theories of truth that is spelled out in terms of the notion of ‘no vicious reference’. Kremer’s Modified Gupta-Belnap Desideratum (MGBD) reads as follows: if theory of truth T dictates that there is no vicious reference in ground model M, then T should dictate that truth behaves like a classical concept in M. In this paper, we suggest an alternative desideratum (AD): if theory of truth T dictates that there is no vicious reference in ground model M, then T should dictate that all T-biconditionals are (strongly) assertible in M. We illustrate that MGBD and AD are not equivalent by means of a Generalized Strong Kleene theory of truth and we argue that AD is preferable over MGBD as a desideratum for theories of truth
Keywords Desiderata for theories of truth  Self-reference  No vicious reference
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s10992-013-9285-3
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 51,639
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Saving Truth From Paradox.Hartry Field - 2008 - Oxford University Press.
Outline of a Theory of Truth.Saul Kripke - 1975 - Journal of Philosophy 72 (19):690-716.
Must We Know What We Say?Matthew Weiner - 2005 - Philosophical Review 114 (2):227-251.
What Is Assertion.John MacFarlane - 2011 - In Jessica Brown & Herman Cappelen (eds.), Assertion. Oxford University Press.

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Conditionals in Theories of Truth.Anil Gupta & Shawn Standefer - 2017 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 46 (1):27-63.
Guest Editors’ Introduction.Riccardo Bruni & Shawn Standefer - 2019 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 48 (1):1-9.
The Revision Theory of Truth.Philip Kremer - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Marginal Notes on the Theory of Reference.Gary H. Merrill - 1979 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 9:35-50.
Truth and Some Relativists.Eddy M. Zemach - 1987 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 29 (1):1-11.
Truth, Reference, and Realism.Zsolt Novák & András Simonyi (eds.) - 2010 - Central European University Press.
Consciousness and Self-Reference.Arthur Falk - 1995 - Erkenntnis 43 (2):151-80.
A Deflationary Theory of Reference.Arvid Båve - 2009 - Synthese 169 (1):51 - 73.
The Subsumption of Reference.David Braddon-Mitchell - 2005 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (1):157-178.
Semantics Without Reference.Christopher Gauker - 1990 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 31 (3):437-461.
Theories and Theories of Truth.Ryan Christensen - 2011 - Metaphysica 12 (1):31-43.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-06-10

Total views
24 ( #409,017 of 2,331,387 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #588,490 of 2,331,387 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes