Character analysis in cladistics: Abstraction, reification, and the search for objectivity

Acta Biotheoretica 57 (1-2):129-162 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The dangers of character reification for cladistic inference are explored. The identification and analysis of characters always involves theory-laden abstraction—there is no theory-free “view from nowhere.” Given theory-ladenness, and given a real world with actual objects and processes, how can we separate robustly real biological characters from uncritically reified characters? One way to avoid reification is through the employment of objectivity criteria that give us good methods for identifying robust primary homology statements. I identify six such criteria and explore each with examples. Ultimately, it is important to minimize character reification, because poor character analysis leads to dismal cladograms, even when proper phylogenetic analysis is employed. Given the deep and systemic problems associated with character reification, it is ironic that philosophers have focused almost entirely on phylogenetic analysis and neglected character analysis.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,174

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
154 (#80,163)

6 months
3 (#208,566)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Rasmus Grønfeldt Winther
University of California, Santa Cruz

References found in this work

Reason, Truth and History.Hilary Putnam - 1981 - Cambridge University Press.
Nature's Capacities and Their Measurement.Nancy Cartwright - 1989 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Reason, Truth and History.Hilary Putnam - 1981 - Cambridge University Press.
Explaining the Brain.Carl F. Craver - 2007 - Oxford University Press.

View all 68 references / Add more references