Clinical Ethicists: Consultants or Professionals?

Journal of Clinical Ethics 25 (1):36-40 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

John H. Evans’s views on the multiple roles of healthcare ethics consultants are based on his claim that bioethics is a “distinct profession” that has a “system of abstract knowledge.” This response to Professor Evans disputes both of his claims. It is argued that clinical ethicists are consultants but not professionals. Their roles as consultants require more than one abstract form of knowledge (principlism). Instead, clinical ethicists rely upon a variety of ethical perspectives and other skills to help resolve conflicts and facilitate healthcare decisions and policy making, whether it is in clinical, research, policy, or organizational contexts. The credibility and effectiveness of clinical ethicists depend upon their knowledge of ethics, their practical experience, and personal abilities, not one form of abstract knowledge.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,323

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The clinical ethicist at the bedside.John Puma & David L. Schiedermayer - 1991 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 12 (2).
""Clinical ethicists and hospital ethics consultants: the nature of the" clinical" role.Leslie Steven Rothenberg - 1989 - In John C. Fletcher, Norman Quist & Albert R. Jonsen (eds.), Ethics Consultation in Health Care. Health Administration Press.
Suffering as a Consideration in Ethical Decision Making.Erich H. Loewy - 1992 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 1 (2):135.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-22

Downloads
5 (#1,545,527)

6 months
3 (#984,214)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?