Don't Stop Thinking About Tomorrow: Attitudes De se and _De motu_

Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 103 (4):772-790 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper argues that the classification of propositional attitudes into the de re, de dicto, and de se is incomplete. De se attitudes are widely agreed to be closely connected to de re attitudes. But there is a species of belief that is linked to agent-centered action in the way that de se beliefs are, but is also associated with entities, places, and especially times, under a description. These mark out a fourth kind. One way to think about what makes them distinctive is that, despite being ‘essentially indexical’ they can be retained across different contexts of evaluation without having diagonal content. The paper also discusses the connection between such beliefs and the kinds of utterances (like ‘Don't put off for tomorrow what you can do today’) that are contested as examples of what David Kaplan called ‘monsters.’

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Who will build the best "tomorrow"?R. Tompson - 2005 - Ukrainian Religious Studies 36:204-210.
Practical Syllogism in Context. De Motu 7 and Zoology.Pierre Morel - 2009 - History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis 12.
Practical Syllogism in Context. De Motu 7 and Zoology.Pierre Morel - 2008 - History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis 11.
What is Special about De Se Attitudes?Stephan Torre & Clas Weber - 2021 - In Heimir Geirsson & Stephen Biggs (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Linguistic Reference. New York: Routledge. pp. 464-481.
Punishment, Retribution, Restoration.Arnold Burms & Gerbert Faure - 2016 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 78 (4):851-862.
Thinking for Tomorrow: reflections on Avner de-Shalit.Peter Marshall - 1993 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 10 (1):105-113.
Berkeley's case against realism about dynamics.Lisa Downing - 1995 - In Robert G. Muehlmann (ed.), Berkeley's Metaphysics: Structural, Interpretive, and Critical Essays. The Pennsylvania State University Press. pp. 197--214.
Illusory attitudes and the playful stoic.Michael Ridge - 2021 - Philosophical Studies 178 (9):2965-2990.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-09-23

Downloads
24 (#642,030)

6 months
7 (#418,426)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Eric Winsberg
University of South Florida

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Demonstratives: An Essay on the Semantics, Logic, Metaphysics and Epistemology of Demonstratives and other Indexicals.David Kaplan - 1989 - In Joseph Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein (eds.), Themes From Kaplan. Oxford University Press. pp. 481-563.
Attitudes de dicto and de se.David Lewis - 1979 - Philosophical Review 88 (4):513-543.
The thought: A logical inquiry.Gottlob Frege - 1956 - Mind 65 (259):289-311.
Collected Papers.Colin McGinn - 1988 - Philosophical Review 97 (2):278.

View all 6 references / Add more references