Natural Processes: Understanding Metaphysics Without Substance

Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In thinking about ontology as the study of being or what fundamentally exists, we can adopt an ontology that either takes substances or processes as primary. There are, however, both commonsense and naturalistic reasons for not fully adopting a substance ontology, which indicate that we ought to suspend judgment with respect to the acceptance of a substance ontology. Doing so allows room to further explore other ontologies. In this book, Andrew M. Winters argues that there are both commonsense and naturalistic reasons for further pursuing a process ontology. Adopting a process ontology allows us to overcome many of the difficulties facing a substance ontology while also accommodating many of the phenomenon that substance ontologies were appealed to for explanation. Given these reasons, we have both commonsense and naturalistic reasons for pursuing and developing a metaphysics without substance.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 105,810

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Can a relational substance ontology be hylomorphic?Travis Dumsday - 2019 - Synthese 198 (Suppl 11):2717-2734.
A Manifesto for a Processual Philosophy of Biology.John A. Dupre & Daniel J. Nicholson - 2018 - In Daniel J. Nicholson & John Dupré, Everything Flows: Towards a Processual Philosophy of Biology. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
God as Substance without Substance Ontology.Wachter Daniel von - 2007 - In Christian Kanzian & Muhammad Legenhausen, Substance and Attribute: Western and Islamic Traditions in Dialogue. Lancaster, LA: Ontos Verlag. pp. 237-245, http://epub.ub.uni-muen.
Are Organisms Substances or Processes?William Morgan - 2022 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 100 (3):605-619.
Descartes and the Metaphysics of Extension.C. G. Normore - 2007 - In Janet Broughton & John Carriero, A Companion to Descartes. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 271–287.
The Metaphysics of Content.Eric Meyer Rubenstein - 1996 - Dissertation, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
A neo-Aristotelian substance ontology: neither relational nor constituent.E. J. Lowe - 2011 - In Tuomas E. Tahko, Contemporary Aristotelian Metaphysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 229-248.
Heidegger’s Relational Ontology.James Filler - 2022 - Maynooth Philosophical Papers 11:35-53.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-05-29

Downloads
52 (#462,852)

6 months
4 (#1,002,927)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Andrew M. Winters
Northern Arizona University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references