Socratic proofs

Journal of Philosophical Logic 33 (3):299-326 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Our aim is to express in exact terms the old idea of solving problems by pure questioning. We consider the problem of derivability: "Is A derivable from Δ by classical propositional logic?". We develop a calculus of questions E*; a proof (called a Socratic proof) is a sequence of questions ending with a question whose affirmative answer is, in a sense, evident. The calculus is sound and complete with respect to classical propositional logic. A Socratic proof in E* can be transformed into a Gentzen-style proof in some sequent calculi. Next we develop a calculus of questions E**; Socratic proofs in E** can be transformed into analytic tableaux. We show that Socratic proofs can be grounded in Inferential Erotetic Logic. After a slight modification, the analyzed systems can also be viewed as hypersequent calculi.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,088

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The method of Socratic proofs for normal modal propositional logics.Dorota Leszczyńska - 2007 - Poznań: Wydawn. Naukowe Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza.
Cut-elimination and proof-search for bi-intuitionistic logic using nested sequents.Rajeev Goré, Linda Postniece & Alwen Tiu - 1998 - In Marcus Kracht, Maarten de Rijke, Heinrich Wansing & Michael Zakharyaschev (eds.), Advances in Modal Logic. CSLI Publications. pp. 43-66.
The method of Socratic proofs for normal modal propositional logics.Dorota Leszczynska-Jasion - 2007 - Poznań: Wydawn. Naukowe Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
84 (#187,956)

6 months
4 (#404,301)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Andrzej Wiśniewski
Adam Mickiewicz University

Citations of this work

Inquiring Attitudes and Erotetic Logic: Norms of Restriction and Expansion.Dennis Whitcomb & Jared Millson - forthcoming - Journal of the American Philosophical Association:1-23.
A Defeasible Calculus for Zetetic Agents.Jared A. Millson - 2021 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 30 (1):3-37.
Socratic Proofs for Quantifiers★.Andrzej Wiśniewski & Vasilyi Shangin - 2006 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 35 (2):147-178.

View all 20 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

First-order logic.Raymond Merrill Smullyan - 1968 - New York [etc.]: Springer Verlag.
Structural Proof Theory.Sara Negri, Jan von Plato & Aarne Ranta - 2001 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Jan Von Plato.
Multiple Conclusion Logic.D. J. Shoesmith & Timothy Smiley - 1978 - Cambridge, England / New York London Melbourne: Cambridge University Press. Edited by T. J. Smiley.
The Posing of Questions: Logical Foundations of Erotetic Inferences.Andrzej Wiśniewski - 1995 - Dordrecht and Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
The method of hypersequents in the proof theory of propositional non-classical logics.Arnon Avron - 1996 - In Wilfrid Hodges (ed.), Logic: Foundations to Applications. Oxford: pp. 1-32.

View all 15 references / Add more references