Stefan Wintein
Tilburg University
In a recent article, Emanuel Rutten has presented a novel argument for the existence of God, defined as a personal being that is the first cause of reality. An interesting feature of the argument, which caused quite a stir, is that it does not fall within any of the traditional categories of arguments for God’s existence. Rutten calls his argument a modal-epistemic one, which reflects the fact that the first premise of his argument states that all possible truths are knowable. The main purpose of this article is a simple one: to point out that Rutten’s modal-epistemic argument is flawed.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11153-018-9664-3
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 51,668
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Ground Between the Gaps.Jonathan Schaffer - 2017 - Philosophers' Imprint 17.
The Problem of Evil and Some Varieties of Atheism.William L. Rowe - 1979 - American Philosophical Quarterly 16 (4):335 - 341.
19 The Problem of Evil and Some Varieties of Atheism.William L. Rowe - 1999 - In Eleonore Stump & Michael J. Murray (eds.), Philosophy of Religion: The Big Questions. Blackwell. pp. 6--157.

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A Modal-Epistemic Argument for the Existence of God.Emanuel Rutten - 2014 - Faith and Philosophy 31 (4):386-400.
Maydole’s 2QS5 Argument.Graham Oppy - 2004 - Philo 7 (2):203-211.
The Modal Symmetry First Cause Argument.Soufiane Hamri - forthcoming - Religious Studies:1-8.
Anselm's Neglected Argument.Brian Leftow - 2002 - Philosophy 77 (3):331-347.
The Two-Dimensional Argument Against Materialism.David Chalmers - 2009 - In Brian P. McLaughlin & Sven Walter (eds.), Oxford Handbook to the Philosophy of Mind. Oxford University Press.
Simple Contextualism About Epistemic Modals Is Incorrect.Benjamin Lennertz - 2014 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 3 (4):252-262.
Modal Epistemology and the Rationalist Renaissance.George Bealer - 2002 - In Tamar Szabo Gendler & John Hawthorne (eds.), Conceivability and Possibility. Oxford University Press. pp. 71-125.


Added to PP index

Total views
38 ( #250,900 of 2,331,392 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #194,788 of 2,331,392 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes