Religious Studies 39 (3):287-298 (2003)
AbstractThe purpose of this paper is to discuss Norman Kretzmann's account of Aquinas's discussion of will in God. According to Kretzmann, Aquinas's reasoning seems to leave no place for choice on God's part, since, on Aquinas's account, God is not free not to will Himself. And so this leads to the problem about God's willing things other than Himself. On this, Kretzmann finds serious problems with Thomas's position. Kretzmann argues that Aquinas should have drawn necessitarian conclusions from his account of divine will. Moreover, in light of one reading of De veritate, q. 24, a. 3, but one not accepted by the Leonine edition, Kretzmann also maintains that Aquinas practically conceded this necessitarian view of God's creative activity in that text. My purpose will be, after presenting Kretzmann's presentation and defence of Aquinas's attribution of will to God, to examine critically his claim that Thomas should have concluded that God is not free not to create, and to determine whether a stronger argument can be made in support of Aquinas's position in light of his texts.
Similar books and articles
Thomas Aquinas and Giles of Rome on the Existence of God as Self-Evident.Mark D. Gossiaux - 2003 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 77 (1):57-79.
The Metaphysics of Creation: Aquinas’s Natural Theology in Summa contra gentiles II.Norman Kretzmann - 1999 - Clarendon Press.
Aquinas's Moral Theory: Essays in Honor of Norman Kretzmann.Scott MacDonald & Eleonore Stump - 1998 - Cornell University Press.
The Metaphysics of Theism: Aquinas’s Natural Theology in Summa Contra Gentiles I.Norman Kretzmann - 2001 - Clarendon Press.
Aquinas, Divine Simplicity, and Divine Freedom.W. Matthews Grant - 2003 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 77:129-144.
Aquinas's philosophical theology.A. Broadie - 1999 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 7 (2):353 – 358.
‘The first thing to know about God’: Kretzmann and Aquinas on the meaning and necessity of arguments for the existence of God.Rudi A. Te Velde - 2003 - Religious Studies 39 (3):251-267.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads