But the empress has no clothes!: Some awkward questions about the ‘missing revolution’ in feminist theory
Feminist Theory 1 (3):261-288 (2000)
Abstract
Who owns feminist theory? and just what is meant by the idea of ‘theory’? We explore these fundamental questions as part of interrogating some emergent orthodoxies about feminist theory, proposing that there is a ‘missing revolution’ in feminist thinking, for while ideas about feminist epistemology, methodology and ethics have been fundamentally reworked, those concerning feminist theory have not. Our purpose is to stimulate a debate about the form of feminist theory, rather than the more usual controversies about its content; and thus our concern is with promoting the development of feminist metatheory. We argue that the now-dominant version of feminist theory is a parallel project to that of mainstream/malestream social theory, and that a feminist autocritique of this and related developments is needed, with the aim of achieving a transformation of the fundamental categories of feminist theory.My notes
Similar books and articles
Rethinking Obligation: A Feminist Method for Political Theory. Cornell University Press, 1992.Nancy J. Hirschmann - 1992 - Cornell University Press.
Situating feminist epistemology.Natalie Alana Ashton & Robin McKenna - 2020 - Episteme 17 (1):28-47.
Feminist Ethics without Feminist Ethical Theory (Or, More Generally, “φ Ethics without φ Ethical Theory”).Nathan Nobis - 2005 - Journal of Philosophical Research 30 (9999):213-225.
Feminist Interventions in Ethics and Politics: Feminist Ethics and Social Theory.Barbara S. Andrew, Jean Clare Keller & Lisa H. Schwartzman (eds.) - 2005 - Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
The trouble with gender: Tales of the still-missing feminist revolution in sociological theory.Joan Alway - 1995 - Sociological Theory 13 (3):209-228.
A feminist perspective on stroke rehabilitation: the relevance of de Beauvoir's theory.Kari Kvigne & Marit Kirkevold - 2002 - Nursing Philosophy 3 (2):79-89.
Line Drawings: Defining Women Through Feminist Practice.Cressida J. Heyes - 2000 - Cornell University Press.
Feminist Theory Reader: Local and Global Perspectives.Carole Ruth McCann & Seung-Kyung Kim (eds.) - 2003 - New York, NY: Routledge.
Fundamental Feminism: Contesting the Core Concepts of Feminist Theory.Judith Grant - 1993 - Routledge.
Partial Reason: Critical and Constructive Transformations of Ethics and Epistemology.Sally E. Talbot - 2000 - Greenwood Press.
Toward a Feminist Philosophy of Economics.Drucilla K. Barker & Edith Kuiper (eds.) - 2003 - Routledge.
Visible Women: Essays on Feminist Legal Theory and Political Philosophy.Susan James & Stephanie Palmer (eds.) - 2002 - Hart.
Analytics
Added to PP
2020-11-25
Downloads
7 (#1,045,441)
6 months
2 (#300,644)
2020-11-25
Downloads
7 (#1,045,441)
6 months
2 (#300,644)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Unity and diversity in feminist legal theory.Margaret Davies - 2007 - Philosophy Compass 2 (4):650–664.
What’s wrong with aspiring to find out what has really happened in academic feminism’s recent past?: Response to Clare Hemmings’ ‘Telling feminist stories’.Rachel Torr - 2007 - Feminist Theory 8 (1):59-67.
Theoretical Perspectives as Ideal‐types: Typologies as Means not Ends.Rachel Torr - 2008 - Social Epistemology 22 (2):145 – 164.
Janice Richardson and Ralph Sandland (eds.), Feminist Perspectives on Law and Theory.Joanne Conaghan - 2002 - Feminist Legal Studies 10 (2):177-183.