IV—Wittgenstein, Anscombe and the Need for Metaphysical Thinking

Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 122 (2):71-95 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Metaphysicians are in the business of making and defending modal claims—claims about how things must, or could or could not be. Wittgenstein’s opposition to necessity claims, along with his various negative remarks about ‘metaphysical’ uses of language, makes it seem almost a truism that Wittgenstein was opposed to metaphysics. In this paper I want to make a case for rejecting that apparent truism. My thesis is that it is illuminating to characterize what Wittgenstein and Anscombe are doing in their philosophical writing as metaphysics without manufactured necessities. Doing so helps to articulate a sharper, more interesting, critique of contemporary metaphysical practices than therapeutic or linguistic framings of Wittgenstein’s method make possible. It also allows us to place Anscombe in the context of a tradition of British metaphysics that emerged in the 1940s in an attempt to reverse the devastating impact on ethics of the new ‘analytical’ philosophy.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,569

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Disagreements: Anscombe, Geach, Wittgenstein.Cora Diamond - 2015 - Philosophical Investigations 38 (1-2):1-24.
Reading Wittgenstein with Anscombe, Going on to Ethics.Cora Diamond - 2019 - London, England: Harvard University Press.
Anscombe and Wittgenstein.Elisa Grimi - 2020 - Enrahonar. An International Journal of Theoretical and Practical Reason 64:165-179.
Asymmetries in Thinking About Thought.Cora Diamond - 2016 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 90 (2):299-315.
Intentionally Suffering?Charles Travis - forthcoming - In Michael O'Sullivan (ed.), ?? Oxford University Press.
Reading Wittgenstein with Anscombe, Going Onto Ethics by Cora Diamond.Peg O'Connor - 2020 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 58 (2):412-413.
The Anscombean Mind.Adrian Haddock & Rachael Wiseman (eds.) - 2021 - New York, NY: Routledge.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-07-02

Downloads
15 (#692,992)

6 months
15 (#60,497)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Rachael Wiseman
University of Liverpool

References found in this work

Modern Moral Philosophy.G. E. M. Anscombe - 1958 - Philosophy 33 (124):1 - 19.
Philosophical investigations.Ludwig Wittgenstein & G. E. M. Anscombe - 1953 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 161:124-124.
Tractatus logico-philosophicus.Ludwig Wittgenstein - 1922 - Filosoficky Casopis 52:336-341.
Wittgenstein on rules and private language.Saul A. Kripke - 1982 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 173 (4):496-499.

View all 29 references / Add more references