Michael Ruse on science and faith: Seeking mutual understanding

Zygon 46 (3):639-654 (2011)
Abstract
Abstract. In Science and Spirituality, Michael Ruse attempts to reconcile traditional Christianity and modern science by arguing that Christianity addresses questions that lie beyond the domain of science. I argue that Ruse's solution raises a number of problems that render it unsatisfactory for both the scientist and believer. First, despite his objections to “God of the gaps” arguments, his own strategy for identifying those questions that are beyond the limits of science seems to raise the problem in a new form. Second, what Ruse offers as evidence for the limits of science is better construed as evidence for deep disagreements among scientists and as such does not support his claims about the limits of science. Third, in aiming to establish their independence, Ruse subordinates religion to science. Finally, his support of traditional theology as a mode of religious understanding might cause concern for those who believe that certain kinds of theological reflection are at odds with scientific thinking
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9744.2011.01203.x
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 31,385
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Is Science Metaphysically Neutral?Iris Fry - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 43 (3):665-673.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Michael Ruse, Science and Spirituality: Making Room for Faith in the Age of Science. [REVIEW]Edward Schoen - 2011 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 70 (1):97-101.
Science and Religion Today. [REVIEW]Michael Ruse - 2011 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 70 (2):167-177.
Methodological Naturalism, Part 2.Alvin Plantinga - 1997 - Origins and Design 18 (2):22-34.
Response to the Commentary: Pro Judice.Michael Ruse - 1982 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 7 (41):19-23.
Ruse's Darwinian Meta-Ethics: A Critique. [REVIEW]Peter Woolcock - 1993 - Biology and Philosophy 8 (4):423-439.
Added to PP index
2011-08-13

Total downloads
85 ( #68,705 of 2,225,946 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #425,621 of 2,225,946 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature