The Monist 104 (1):125-151 (2021)

Donovan Wishon
University of Mississippi
Neutral monism is the view that both ‘mind’ and ‘matter’ are grounded in a more fundamental form of reality that is intrinsically neither mental nor material. It has often been treated as an odd fringe theory deserving of at most a footnote in the broader philosophical debates. Yet such attitudes do a grave disservice to its sophistications and significance for late nineteenth and early twentieth-century philosophy of mind and psychology. This paper sheds light on this neglected view by situating it within broader historical monist debates about the mind and bringing attention to one of its central internal disputes regarding ‘mental chemistry’. By taking a closer look at how Ernst Mach, William James, and Bertrand Russell address the question of whether and how our mental episodes are composed of more basic elements, it highlights deep differences among their conceptions of the fundamental ‘neutral stuff’ and its relations to ‘mind’ and ‘matter’.
Keywords Bertrand Russell  Neutral Monism  Ernst Mach  William James  Radical Empiricism  Russellian Monism  Mental Chemistry  Panpsychism  Monism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/monist/onaa026
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,410
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Problems of Philosophy.Bertrand Russell - 1912 - Mind 21 (84):556-564.
The Refutation of Idealism.G. E. Moore - 1903 - Mind 12 (48):433-453.
Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkte.F. Brentano - 1876 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 1:209-213.
Human Knowledge, Its Scope and Limits.Bertrand Russell - 1949 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 54 (2):198-199.

View all 70 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

John Dewey and the Mind-Body Problem in the Context: The Case of «Neutral Monism».Andrii Leonov - 2018 - Actual Problems of Mind. Philosophy Journal 19 (19):72-96.
Neutral Monism Reconsidered.Erik C. Banks - 2010 - Philosophical Psychology 23 (2):173-187.
Whither Neutral Monism?Marius Dumitru - 2013 - In Gabriel Vacariu & Gheorghe Stefanov (eds.), Problema minte-creier in neurostiinta cognitiei. Bucharest University Press. pp. 127-134.
Review of Erik Banks: Realistic Empiricism (2014). [REVIEW]Mostyn W. Jones - forthcoming - Journal of Consciousness Studies.
A NEW APPROACH TO NEUTRAL MONISM AND THE MIND-MATTER CONTROVERSY.Rafael Andrés Alemañ Berenguer - 2018 - Naturaleza y Libertad. Revista de Estudios Interdisciplinares 11:11-33.
Leaving the Soul Apart. An Introductory Study.Pietro Gori - 2015 - Philosophical Readings 7 (2):3-13.


Added to PP index

Total views
42 ( #272,016 of 2,519,871 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #116,855 of 2,519,871 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes