Environmental Ethics 8 (3):261-270 (1986)
AbstractDeep ecology has been criticized for being anti-anthropocentric, ignorant of feminism, and utopian. Most of the arguments against deep ecology, however, are based on uncritical use of these terms. Deep ecology places anthropocentrism, feminism, and utopianism into a proper perspective--deep anthropology-which pennits understanding of the human relationships with other beings in nature, in a total-fieldmodel, without accepting unhealthy extremes. The principles of deep ecology are concerned with creating good places, rather than the “no places” of modem industrial cultures
Similar books and articles
The Deep Ecology-Ecofeminism Debate and its Parallels.Warwick Fox - 1989 - Environmental Ethics 11 (1):5-25.
Deep Ecology and Ecofeminism: The Self in Environmental Philosophy.Colette Sciberras - 2002 - Dissertation, Lancaster
Dōgen, Deep Ecology, and the Ecological Self.Deane Curtin - 1994 - Environmental Ethics 16 (2):195-213.
Deep Ecology From the Perspective of Environmental Science.Frank B. Golley - 1987 - Environmental Ethics 9 (1):45-55.
Eco-Socialism: From Deep Ecology to Social Justice.David Pepper - 1993 - Routledge.
Feminism, Depp Ecology, and Environmental Ethics.Michael E. Zimmerman - 1987 - Environmental Ethics 9 (1):21-44.
Anthropomorphism Without Anthropocentrism: A Wittgensteinian Ecofeminist Alternative to Deep Ecology.Wendy Lee-Lampshire - 1996 - Ethics and the Environment 1 (2):91-102.
Rethinking the Heidegger-Deep Ecology Relationship.Michael E. Zimmerman - 1993 - Environmental Ethics 15 (3):195-224.
On Warwick Fox’s Assessment of Deep Ecology.Harold Glasser - 1997 - Environmental Ethics 19 (1):69-85.
Struggle for Nature: A Critique of Radical Ecology.Jozef Keulartz - 1998 - Routledge.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Anthropocentrism as the Scapegoat of the Environmental Crisis: A Review.Laÿna Droz - 2022 - Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics 22:25-49.
References found in this work
No references found.